<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: eTSP - The Softback Preview</title>
	<link>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2005/11/29/etsp-the-softback-preview/</link>
	<description>English, Rationalist and Liberal Conservative</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Fey</title>
		<link>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2005/11/29/etsp-the-softback-preview/#comment-24076</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 13:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2005/11/29/etsp-the-softback-preview/#comment-24076</guid>
					<description>Hi 

I posted here back in May and so far since I dropped a note re: contacting the DMA I've not heard a word from them since (touch wood).

All the best</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi </p>
<p>I posted here back in May and so far since I dropped a note re: contacting the DMA I&#8217;ve not heard a word from them since (touch wood).</p>
<p>All the best
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lord Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2005/11/29/etsp-the-softback-preview/#comment-22914</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2005/11/29/etsp-the-softback-preview/#comment-22914</guid>
					<description>It's like having a stalker or something.  (shakes head).  Hope everything worked out for you - sorry for bringing this fuss to your door step I'm sure it's the last thing you need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s like having a stalker or something.  (shakes head).  Hope everything worked out for you - sorry for bringing this fuss to your door step I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s the last thing you need.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: GarthNotley</title>
		<link>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2005/11/29/etsp-the-softback-preview/#comment-22894</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 06:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2005/11/29/etsp-the-softback-preview/#comment-22894</guid>
					<description>You do not need to be concerned.  The case &quot;Lord Matt&quot; refers to is not about &quot;damage to their/my business&quot; and since he has brought my name into it I feel a response is in order. The case is not about Mathew Brown (alias “Lord Matt”) stating negative views about the SEO techniques used, however rude and hectoring his language may have been. After all, the details of search engine optimisation techniques are hardly a matter for the courts.

The case to be answered is that Mathew Brown libelled Dr Notley, in that Mr Brown alleged that Dr Notley lied to members about receiving money for advertising. These allegations are false, and extremely damaging to Dr Notley, an honest businessman, and Mr Brown will fail in his defence because the truth of these matters is capable of independent audit.

However, while sharing your views about the importance of retaining an independent voice, you do not need to be concerned in this instance. The removal of the offending article(s) will have no effect on any bloggers’ right to express their views about businesses or governments, so long as they refrain from defamatory falsehoods, which has always been the case, and I hope will always remain so. I assume you would not support anyone’s right to publicly defame you, me or anyone else with false allegations.

You may publish these remarks if you publish them in full and without editing or interjections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do not need to be concerned.  The case &#8220;Lord Matt&#8221; refers to is not about &#8220;damage to their/my business&#8221; and since he has brought my name into it I feel a response is in order. The case is not about Mathew Brown (alias “Lord Matt”) stating negative views about the SEO techniques used, however rude and hectoring his language may have been. After all, the details of search engine optimisation techniques are hardly a matter for the courts.</p>
<p>The case to be answered is that Mathew Brown libelled Dr Notley, in that Mr Brown alleged that Dr Notley lied to members about receiving money for advertising. These allegations are false, and extremely damaging to Dr Notley, an honest businessman, and Mr Brown will fail in his defence because the truth of these matters is capable of independent audit.</p>
<p>However, while sharing your views about the importance of retaining an independent voice, you do not need to be concerned in this instance. The removal of the offending article(s) will have no effect on any bloggers’ right to express their views about businesses or governments, so long as they refrain from defamatory falsehoods, which has always been the case, and I hope will always remain so. I assume you would not support anyone’s right to publicly defame you, me or anyone else with false allegations.</p>
<p>You may publish these remarks if you publish them in full and without editing or interjections.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gav</title>
		<link>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2005/11/29/etsp-the-softback-preview/#comment-22103</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2005/11/29/etsp-the-softback-preview/#comment-22103</guid>
					<description>For the sake of clarity I would be pleased to be proven wrong about the TSP and I am only recording my experience which every customer has the right to know just as every company has the right to publish testimonials.

Thank you my Lord, though, for the warning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the sake of clarity I would be pleased to be proven wrong about the TSP and I am only recording my experience which every customer has the right to know just as every company has the right to publish testimonials.</p>
<p>Thank you my Lord, though, for the warning.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lord Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2005/11/29/etsp-the-softback-preview/#comment-22084</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2005/11/29/etsp-the-softback-preview/#comment-22084</guid>
					<description>Be careful that they don't try to sue you &quot;for damage to their business&quot; as Dr M G Notley is currently doing to me because I exposed his bad and black hat SEO on my blog.  Real pain in the backside that man is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be careful that they don&#8217;t try to sue you &#8220;for damage to their business&#8221; as Dr M G Notley is currently doing to me because I exposed his bad and black hat SEO on my blog.  Real pain in the backside that man is.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Andrew Ball</title>
		<link>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2005/11/29/etsp-the-softback-preview/#comment-19951</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2005/11/29/etsp-the-softback-preview/#comment-19951</guid>
					<description>I have recently decided to curtail my membership of the softback preview after ordering 3 books back in early April and never having received any of them, despite one being returned to them as 'never delivered' ! 

Despite regular communications to the director of customer service they invoiced me for the books, added late payment charges and were unable to explain why the items were not delivered to me in the 3 months of the sorry saga.

I had been a fairly satisfied customer since the early nineties but noted a decline when the TSP became part of the BCA stable a few years back. Since then service has deteriorated and the amount of junk in the monthly mailing increased.

The last e-mail regarding my membership is as follows:

Dear Mr Ball,
 
Please accept my sincere apologies for the continued problems you have been experiencing  with the non delivery of your April order.
 
I note that you have still not received ON CHESIL BEACH and that although ZIGZAG has been returned to us by our Courier, this item was never delivered to your address. I can only assume that it was returned by our Courier as an undelivered item and that ON CHESIL BEACH has been lost in transit.
 
In the circumstance, I have cleared your account of all charges relating to this order. I have also reluctantly, cancelled your membership, as requested.
 
I am sorry that your association with The Softback Preview is ending in this way.
 
Regards
Jasmin Moody 
Customer Service Manager 
Telephone 01793 747110 
E.mail:jmoody@bca.co.uk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have recently decided to curtail my membership of the softback preview after ordering 3 books back in early April and never having received any of them, despite one being returned to them as &#8216;never delivered&#8217; ! </p>
<p>Despite regular communications to the director of customer service they invoiced me for the books, added late payment charges and were unable to explain why the items were not delivered to me in the 3 months of the sorry saga.</p>
<p>I had been a fairly satisfied customer since the early nineties but noted a decline when the TSP became part of the BCA stable a few years back. Since then service has deteriorated and the amount of junk in the monthly mailing increased.</p>
<p>The last e-mail regarding my membership is as follows:</p>
<p>Dear Mr Ball,</p>
<p>Please accept my sincere apologies for the continued problems you have been experiencing  with the non delivery of your April order.</p>
<p>I note that you have still not received ON CHESIL BEACH and that although ZIGZAG has been returned to us by our Courier, this item was never delivered to your address. I can only assume that it was returned by our Courier as an undelivered item and that ON CHESIL BEACH has been lost in transit.</p>
<p>In the circumstance, I have cleared your account of all charges relating to this order. I have also reluctantly, cancelled your membership, as requested.</p>
<p>I am sorry that your association with The Softback Preview is ending in this way.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Jasmin Moody<br />
Customer Service Manager<br />
Telephone 01793 747110<br />
E.mail:jmoody@bca.co.uk
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alastair Ward</title>
		<link>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2005/11/29/etsp-the-softback-preview/#comment-17886</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 10:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2005/11/29/etsp-the-softback-preview/#comment-17886</guid>
					<description>I got stung by a charge for my initial books yesterday. After two and a half years I got sick of their shoddy admin and cancelled, only to be told I owed them for my initial order (which I took on offer, pound for three books) as I didn't order anything in my first year of membership.

Bit alarming, if I was supposed to buy more books, why didn't they say so after the year was up instead of waiting for now? Clearly I misread the bit that said &quot;no commitment&quot;...

Alastair</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got stung by a charge for my initial books yesterday. After two and a half years I got sick of their shoddy admin and cancelled, only to be told I owed them for my initial order (which I took on offer, pound for three books) as I didn&#8217;t order anything in my first year of membership.</p>
<p>Bit alarming, if I was supposed to buy more books, why didn&#8217;t they say so after the year was up instead of waiting for now? Clearly I misread the bit that said &#8220;no commitment&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>Alastair
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gav</title>
		<link>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2005/11/29/etsp-the-softback-preview/#comment-17794</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 15:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2005/11/29/etsp-the-softback-preview/#comment-17794</guid>
					<description>Good luck Fey -- do keep us posted on your progress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck Fey &#8212; do keep us posted on your progress.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Fey</title>
		<link>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2005/11/29/etsp-the-softback-preview/#comment-17793</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 15:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2005/11/29/etsp-the-softback-preview/#comment-17793</guid>
					<description>Since my post I've found out that complaints to the Direct Marketing Authority can work so I have emailed ETSP to let them know that I going to contact the DMA. Fingers crossed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since my post I&#8217;ve found out that complaints to the Direct Marketing Authority can work so I have emailed ETSP to let them know that I going to contact the DMA. Fingers crossed.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Fey</title>
		<link>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2005/11/29/etsp-the-softback-preview/#comment-17792</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 14:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2005/11/29/etsp-the-softback-preview/#comment-17792</guid>
					<description>I've got the same going on with me I cancelled 9 months ago and they my online account was disconnected immediately. Heard nothing for a long time then one day someone tried to deliver a parcel and I refused to take it. 

I've since been receiving payment demands I called after the first one and they wanted proof that I had returned the outstanding books. When I said I had none I was told that a form would come out to me - I got nothing and so I called again and again nothing the payment demands keeping coming and on Friday I came home to a new letter from Computerised Debt collection agency informing me that their clients have instructed them to take whatever action is necessary to recover the o/s balance. I called the debt agency they told me that i would have to talk to ESTP - well they closed at 5pm. I'm now having nightmares of bailiffs breaking into my house. This is blackmail can they send bailiffs to my house? and the outstanding amount keeps going I've even been tempted to pay it just to get rid of the stress before I end up with a bill for £000's. Will this effect my clean credit record? I hate this company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got the same going on with me I cancelled 9 months ago and they my online account was disconnected immediately. Heard nothing for a long time then one day someone tried to deliver a parcel and I refused to take it. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve since been receiving payment demands I called after the first one and they wanted proof that I had returned the outstanding books. When I said I had none I was told that a form would come out to me - I got nothing and so I called again and again nothing the payment demands keeping coming and on Friday I came home to a new letter from Computerised Debt collection agency informing me that their clients have instructed them to take whatever action is necessary to recover the o/s balance. I called the debt agency they told me that i would have to talk to ESTP - well they closed at 5pm. I&#8217;m now having nightmares of bailiffs breaking into my house. This is blackmail can they send bailiffs to my house? and the outstanding amount keeps going I&#8217;ve even been tempted to pay it just to get rid of the stress before I end up with a bill for £000&#8217;s. Will this effect my clean credit record? I hate this company.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
