… other than that he lied (which is probably more sad that he felt he had to than objectionable), it doesn’t matter.
And that’s all I’ll say on the matter.
Like this entry? Share it with others:
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
About Simon Hughes…
- No trackbacks yet.
Comments are closed.
#1 by Gareth on January 26th, 2006 - 10:21 pm
It doesn’t matter to me but what do you think about the campaign slogan that he used against Peter Tatchel?
Innocent mistake or slur against his sexuality?
Looks like it’s mainly Conservative supporters that are out for Hughes’ blood, which is strange because you’d think that they would prefer the more left-wing candidate – one that would challenge Labour and possibly cause defections to Cameron’s Tories.
#2 by Gav on January 26th, 2006 - 11:05 pm
Probably a slur… But that’s not the point (maybe)…
I actually think Hughes’ politics would have less influence on the Lib Dems popularity than his charisma. Charles Kennedy may have been seen as the nice chap, but no thinker took him seriously and would have been seriously concerned about allowing him to run the British economy/government. Hughes is different: he can carry an audience and he sounds reasonable even when he’s suggesting banning cars from London…
And all that I have just said is not because of your second paragraph, honestly!
#3 by Gav on January 26th, 2006 - 11:10 pm
Thinking about it, I’ve decided that this:
Is not affected by the admission — it was wrong if deliberate regardless…