Comments on: No thought’s unique http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2006/02/17/no-thoughts-unique/ Liberal, Green and Fair Thu, 08 Jul 2010 17:18:32 +0100 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Gav http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2006/02/17/no-thoughts-unique/#comment-3019 Gav Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:32:35 +0000 http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2006/02/17/no-thoughts-unique/#comment-3019 Thanks for the clarification. Thanks for the clarification.

]]> By: Jim http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2006/02/17/no-thoughts-unique/#comment-3011 Jim Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:32:47 +0000 http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2006/02/17/no-thoughts-unique/#comment-3011 Actually, the definition is "apparatus installed or used for the purpose of receiving (whether by means of wireless telegraphy or otherwise) any television programme service", not simply capability, so the legal status of phones with TV capabilities that aren't used is a bit fuzzy. IANAL, &c Actually, the definition is “apparatus installed or used for the purpose of receiving (whether by means of wireless telegraphy or otherwise) any television programme service”, not simply capability, so the legal status of phones with TV capabilities that aren’t used is a bit fuzzy.

IANAL, &c

]]>