Archive for February 23rd, 2006

Quote of the Day is this week [sic] from Alistair Darling on why it is right that from May 2010 it will be illegal to sell in our culture’s measures: pounds (lbs) and ounces (ozs):

“Err, well, erm… You’ll have to accept it…”

Watch this week’s Question Time again to see UKIP’s Nigel Farage attacking Labour’s unprotected underbelly here.

Oh, and since when has it been acceptable for the presenter to include an anecdote that supports, whether intentionally or not, one particular point of view?


What’s more important, people or buildings?

Obvious, say the respondents, people. And yet, when I first heard and saw what happened at Samarra on Tuesday, I knew this was more serious than a few people being blown up. It’s obvious why really. An attack on an individual is an attack on that individual, his family and anyone else who knew and loved them. While an attack on a holy shrine is an attack on all people and especially all people who have a religious interest in that shrine. As Shakir Al-Anbari of Al-Mada said:

An attack on what is holy insults mankind.

When the Taliban destroyed those ancient statues in 2001, I literally felt sickness in my heart. What short-sighted, arrogant and evil minds must be behind such wanton vandalism?

(Update: Video showing destruction)

The same is true, now, of the golden dome of the shrine in Samarra. That someone could find it in their heart to destroy something that, regardless of your religion, was beautiful, saddens me greatly. Every time I see the before and after shots on the news, I want to believe it is a computer mock-up.

People are more important — but when a building or other object is attacked that means a lot to people (for any reason) it is an attack on more people. Those behind the destruction must have known the fall-out it would create. Anyone wanting to trigger Civil War in England would need only destroy the tower containing Big Ben to see their cause furthered. The new series of Doctor Who showed the spaceship crashing into it for that reason.

It would be wrong of me to call for calm from the Shia following this. I just hope peace can win in the end.

The reason for my headline, though, is that I thought I would say what many people are thinking in their darker moments. An atrocity that can be seen and experienced by all, and especially Muslims, has occurred. This situation, I imagine, calls for demonstrations on the streets of London, Bradford, Paris, Amsterdam… dare I say it, Copenhagen. If the people involved in protests following the cartoons were on the streets I would expect even more vehement and zealous demands for heads.

And yet there is a silence. Maybe everyone’s too shocked at what happened? Maybe they’re taking a considered view of the likely impact of their protests on the unstable position in Iraq? Maybe the media is not reporting it for the same reason?

Or maybe the cartoon was an excuse to attack the hosts that they don’t respect?

Where are these protesters now? Did they really believe that a cartoon was more serious than the destruction desecration of a religious burial place?


The BBC is a taxpayer-funded organisation. The ONS accepts that it is a public body for the purposes of taxation and yet they think this is acceptable:

Different versions for Brits and ‘International’ readers.