Archive for July, 2006

Doctor Monica Whitty of Queen’s University Belfast has asked me to help her gain some of her required 1,000 participants.

The survey can be found here: Survey

The purpose of this study is to ascertain how individuals in different countries use their work computers and/or laptop computers. It also asks how they protect their work computers and/or laptops from security risks.

She’s looking for individuals 18 years or over and who currently live and work (full time/part time or casually) in Australia, the Netherlands, Singapore, the UK, or USA. Only people who use a computer and/or laptop at work are invited to complete this survey (although you don’t need to use one regularly).

A summary of the results will be published from about November 2006 - December 2006 on my website:
Survey results.


Tonight we had our first four-hour planning meeting since the election and our first tied vote… Much fun at Council.

As ever, I would like to point out that decisions made are the committees decisions and I do not mean to prejudice that when writing of that tie. Incidentally ties are decided by the Chair’s casting vote — what a responsibility!


John King has provided us with some news and that, along with something else I just watched has managed to flip me!

Israel are now using “targetted strikes” implying that its previous tactic was indiscriminate bombing. Israel declares a period of cessation of bombing and then goes against that before Hezbollah fires a missile within that 48 hour period.

It makes one ask the question, was Israel relishing an opportunity to claim “they started it”? This is no longer self-defence — it is now cynical. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t want Hezbollah to win, but I do want Israel to stop and allow UN peace-makers to take over as soon as practicable.


The proposed merger of Sussex and Surrey Police by our Home Office has yielded this response from the Council’s Policy and Strategy Committee:

Resolved that Adur District Council vigorously oppose the proposed merger of Sussex and Surrey Police areas on financial grounds and the potential loss of local knowledge, loss of local democratic control and reduced quality of service for local people.

You can read the full minutes here: Minutes of 25 July 2006 Policy and Strategy Committee meeting.

I think this is great news!


I am very excited about the possibility of illegal drugs being reclassified so that their harm is taken into account scientifically (BBC News).

I do like to ‘take’ alcohol… Maybe we will be able to have a more fair, reasonable and logical drug-use policy in future?


Israel has started a period of cessation of fighting today and Hezbollah attacked again regardless…

I am going to be generous and assume that communications have not reached Hezbollah’s forces yet. If not, then they are asking for airstrikes to restart and any sympathy I had (which I had in abundance, believe me), will evaporate into further dislike for the murdering terrorists that Lebanon harbours and aids (providing transit for Iranian missiles for instance).


Thanks to J0nz of Drunken Blogging for this shocking video:


I am intrigued by the BBC’s Have Your Say. Once again the majority of people agree with me: BBC Have Your Say.

Yes, Israel should have waited and asked for UN intervention (regardless how pointless that would have been).

Yes, Israel is the victim of BBC and other left-wing journalists failing to note the true solution to this crisis: Hezbollah’s defeat.

And, yes, the Lebanese are suffering where they need not…

But the people of Britain agree with Blair — a cease fire should not be sought until Hezbollah return their kidnappees. Israel have said that they will allow an international peace making force and will withdraw when that happens. What more can we ask?


There are fourteen planning applications tomorrow so the public gallery may be quite busy, but for anyone interested in watching their local democracy, it’s an interesting committee which is well worth attending.

The meeting starts at 7pm in the Adur Civic Centre on Ham Road.


No matter where you live, come down and join our march:

The following was sent to all KWASH supporters who gave us their e-mail addresses when signing the petition:

March and rally – Next Wednesday

On Wednesday August 2nd Worthing Council have organised a public meeting to be held at the Worthing Pavilion Theatre on the promenade by the pier, starting at 7pm, and to be chaired by Mayor Tom Wye.

Before the meeting there will be 2 marches to the Pavilion:

• From the east, meeting behind the Aquarena at 6pm
• From the west, meeting at the bottom of George V Avenue at 6pm

Bring your banners, dress brightly, be noisy and make your point. We hope that all the local media will be there in force so we need as many people as possible to make it work. If the Pavilion is full we will have speakers outside to relay the meeting to the crowds in Steyne gardens.

This meeting will update you on details of the campaign so far; enable residents to ask questions and raise points and set up a steering group to oversee the campaign into the autumn.

Pick up a poster

The local Herald newspaper series has been very proactive in the whole hospital campaign. Today they will be printing a poster in the local editions and we would urge you all to display the poster in your windows. We will also be circulating a downloadable version soon and extra copies will be available at the public meeting.

Can you help?

So far the campaign has largely been run out of the MPs’ offices and we are being overwhelmed with all the extra paperwork coming in daily. At the public meeting we are looking to set up a steering group of volunteers to help in the Worthing district with the campaign. If you would like to help and can offer any particular skills with computer work, sending out letters etc then we want to hear from you. Reply to this e-mail: campaign@kwash.org.uk


Just wow: What Russia has done.


An interesting take on Trial by Jury by Richard Dawkins in 1997.

The principle argument about the allowing of guilty people to go free is that it is better that ten guilty people are acquited than one innocent man has his liberty taken away.

What if juries don’t assure that?
Does a state employee (Judge) fair better?
Would an elected judge help?
What is the answer to fair, robust trials?
What if one of those ten guilty people damage more than one life in a more severe way than mere incarceration of an innocent does?
Who should be involved in the decision to remove trial by jury? Ministers, elected representatives, the people, select committees…

I would also direct you to this speech: Attorney General’s Speech to the Fraud Advisory Panel on 22 March 2006.

These are not questions I yet know the answer to (and frankly I have no influence in any case), but do tell me what you think!


For no reason I can fathom this site now looks odd on Internet Explorer. Please let me know in the comments whether it looks okay to you!


Further to my last post, our MP Tim Loughton has issued an electronic poster and petition for the possible closures:
- KWASH Petition
- KWASH Poster


As I said previously there was an Extraordinary meeting of the Council on 20 July to look at the possible cuts to hospital services and pass a motion about the Council’s feelings about this.

We urged that the hospital’s services not be cut etc. The key parts are these:

Councillor Richard Burt advised that the Council would get the Liberal Democrat support as they are fully against any closures.

Councillor Neil Parkin moved the recommendation and this was seconded by Councillor Gavin Ayling.

Resolved: that the Council’s response to the consultation on ‘Creating an NHS Fit for the Future’ be agreed as follows:

(i) that Adur District Council will object in the strongest terms to any attempt to close Worthing or Southland’s Hospitals. It will also object in the strongest terms to any closure of the Accident and Emergency department and Maternity or any Acute services at Worthing Hospital;

(ii) that In the event of any changes, Adur District Council calls on the Strategic Health Authority to ensure local replacement services are in place before any current ones are axed;

(iii) that Adur District Council requests our Member of Parliament Tim Loughton continue to lobby the Government for a fair level of funding for hospitals in West Sussex;

(iv) that this Council fully supports the K.W.A.S.H. campaign.

(More info on the KWASH campaign)

It should also be noted that former councillor Peter Berry spoke on behalf of the Labour party in Adur. The minutes say:

Mr Berry felt that the proposed recommendation was one of common sense and advised that the Local Labour Group offers its full support of the action.

The full minutes can be found here: Full minutes.


I returned today from the International e-Participation and Local Democracy Symposium. It really was fantastic and it’s going to change what I blog about. I’ll try to put into practice some of what I learnt.

I also had an interesting conversation about Lebanon/Israel with one of the conference attendees and I have to admit I am softening on the position I put in my last post. But enough about that — we cannot change the wrongness of it all.

I’ll spend some more time tomorrow trying to trim down a bit of all that I want to say about the Symposium. For now, I’ll just echo what Sam said in the Closing Plenary (for those who attended who are reading this)…


An idea for you all


As I mentioned before, I’ll be in Hungary for a Symposium from tomorrow onwards.

I’ll try and find time to blog during the week (but I’ll not try hard to be honest), but be assured there’ll be info here after that which will be more interesting than peas defrosting(hopefully Andrew).


Israel is being painted as the agressor in this most recent conflict. This is just patently wrong.

Israel is being accused of being ‘disproportionate’ (by the media, not the government). This, too, is just wrong.

And here is why:

Israel had two soldiers kidnapped by a terrorist organisation that, while not openly supported by the Lebanese government, is tolerated through a combination of apathy and weakness. That organisation brought upon itself military pressure designed to disable the terrorist organisation and bring about the release of their soldiers. Neither of these goals have yet been achieved (one of which is clearly in the hands of Hezbollah to bring about). If the goal were achieved in one hour and the bombings continued — then the response would have been disproportionate; but as the release of their soldiers was not brought about, one could suggest that Israel’s response was not strong enough.

Today’s Spectator goes into some detail about the likely long-term effects of capitulation to Islamofacists, but I will be less dramatic and leave myself open to fewer claims of “you were wrong”. Suffice it to say, if we do not stop terrorist organisations from attacking the West (in which I include Israel) with no ‘freedom’ issue at its source, then we will be committing ourselves to a much longer fight with militant Islam.

The ANC had something to fight for that could be brought about by those in charge… They were also fighting a clear wrong. The IRA had something to fight for which was not a clear wrong (democratic as it all was)… Hezbollah do not want anything more than an Islamic hegemony… This is anti-democratic and so indefensible.


At this evening’s Council Meeting covering the possible future closure of the local Accident and Emergency at Worthing Hospital, Cllr. Keith Dollemore made a considered statement about the effect the closures would have on the older, more vulnerable and poorer people who need to use public transport to visit loved ones etc.

And from the public gallery I overheard a former Labour Councillor who lost his seat this May. He said something about caring for the poor being the concern of “socialist”s.

This highlights one of the great failures of Conservatives and one of the great successes of Labour. Labour has managed, through years of lying, to get people to believe that Conservatives do not care about the plight of the poor, vulnerable and needy.

The comment was wrong because Conservatives really do care and the evidence I have seen suggests that they care more than many other parties’ members.

The same is true of many other policy areas. The environment, it is oft-said, is not an area of strength for Conservatives. But Conservative Councils recycle more. The trouble is people see inaction on greenhouse gas emissions as either scientifically unsound or a reflection of the Conservative don’t-care attitude. But Conservatives understand something even more fundamental: Without wealth, without business creating wealth and giving it to its staff, the economy cannot provide anything for its people.

People see large Range Rovers and say “That’s unnecessary for the town” but where else in public life do we have the right to tell people what they may buy? Range Rover owners are paying disproportionate tax and, if the government really cared, this would be being spent on green research etc. But it is not.

Personally I have recently had an anti-David Attenborough moment, but that’s not the point I’m trying to make.

Conservatives care more about the things that matter but they also carry around their fair share of pragmatism. Don’t have overly-powerful unions because, whatever the good intention, you will damage the economy that people rely on. Don’t positively discriminate for ethnic minorities because, whatever the good intention, it will fuel racial prejudice, it will damage self-esteem and it will, ultimately, fail. Don’t stop people from buying cars because without cars the economy would fail… There are many businesses and other parts of our economy that rely on them. By all means, try and find a solution, but don’t try and find a solution despite the facts!

And this is why Conservatives recycle so much more: Recycling is a win-win, pragmatic activity. Don’t overfill the countryside with landfill, don’t waste finite resources of aluminium, steel, oil etc, recycle for free and have your cake and eat it. A survey has not been done of the political make-up of those who own energy-saving light bulbs, but I think I am on safe ground in saying that Tories will have them for the two obvious reasons: They cost less to run and they cost less when you count all the separate purchases of normal bulbs. That they help protect the environment as well: that’s a happy extra.


I haven’t looked in any significant detail at John Reid’s likely announcement today, but what I saw on BBC News last night filled me with naive hope. Will we, perhaps, have tougher sentencing that reflects the crime and the needs of the public to be protected from crime?

Will we, at last, have a Home Office that knows who is leaving the country and that stops allowing so many people to immigrate that our infrastructure is collapsing?

Based on the government’s record I doubt it, but at least there’s hope. I’ll post more later.