<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conference over</title>
	<link>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2006/10/08/conference-over/</link>
	<description>English, Rationalist and Liberal Conservative</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Gav</title>
		<link>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2006/10/08/conference-over/#comment-16585</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 20:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2006/10/08/conference-over/#comment-16585</guid>
					<description>I guess the point is this:

In FPTP you have little choice about your vote. It either counts and goes towards Labour/Libdem/Conservative or it doesn't count and goes towards UKIP/Green/EDP etc.

Now in those three that count if you're right wing at all you have to vote Conservative. If Cameron upsets us right-wingers slightly with his apparently 'soft' agenda then he's not really risking our votes -- they're in the bag. But he does &lt;i&gt;risk&lt;/i&gt; picking up right wing Labour and LibDem types.

Even better, though, I don't think he's saying anything wrong. If you read exactly what he says rather than the headlines he intends the BBC/Guardian/Mirror to report you'll see that most of his so-called soft policies are good old fashioned libertarian (as libertarian, sadly, as the party goes) Tory policies wrapped in a sugar coating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the point is this:</p>
<p>In FPTP you have little choice about your vote. It either counts and goes towards Labour/Libdem/Conservative or it doesn&#8217;t count and goes towards UKIP/Green/EDP etc.</p>
<p>Now in those three that count if you&#8217;re right wing at all you have to vote Conservative. If Cameron upsets us right-wingers slightly with his apparently &#8217;soft&#8217; agenda then he&#8217;s not really risking our votes &#8212; they&#8217;re in the bag. But he does <i>risk</i> picking up right wing Labour and LibDem types.</p>
<p>Even better, though, I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s saying anything wrong. If you read exactly what he says rather than the headlines he intends the BBC/Guardian/Mirror to report you&#8217;ll see that most of his so-called soft policies are good old fashioned libertarian (as libertarian, sadly, as the party goes) Tory policies wrapped in a sugar coating.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David B. Wildgoose</title>
		<link>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2006/10/08/conference-over/#comment-16513</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2006/10/08/conference-over/#comment-16513</guid>
					<description>I would hardly describe myself as &quot;far-right&quot; and I loathe the man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would hardly describe myself as &#8220;far-right&#8221; and I loathe the man.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tony Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2006/10/08/conference-over/#comment-16265</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 11:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2006/10/08/conference-over/#comment-16265</guid>
					<description>Most people will think of him as nice but ineffectual-not so genius!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most people will think of him as nice but ineffectual-not so genius!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
