<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grammars Ditched</title>
	<link>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2007/05/17/grammars-ditched/</link>
	<description>English, Rationalist and Liberal Conservative</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2007/05/17/grammars-ditched/#comment-17823</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 00:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2007/05/17/grammars-ditched/#comment-17823</guid>
					<description>If anyone doubted how bad Cameron now is, take a look at this:
BBC's Question Time:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/question_time/6681193.stm

Cameron has the Bob Crow position!  Insane!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone doubted how bad Cameron now is, take a look at this:<br />
BBC&#8217;s Question Time:<br />
<a href='http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/question_time/6681193.stm' rel='nofollow'>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/question_time/6681193.stm</a></p>
<p>Cameron has the Bob Crow position!  Insane!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gav</title>
		<link>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2007/05/17/grammars-ditched/#comment-17800</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 11:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2007/05/17/grammars-ditched/#comment-17800</guid>
					<description>I know your question is rhetorical but I do think Cameron should answer it. He said he stood for change, but that was taken to mean &quot;change to reflect modern (and correct) attitudes to homosexuality etc.&quot; not &quot;change to reflect socialist ideals as advocated by Labour&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know your question is rhetorical but I do think Cameron should answer it. He said he stood for change, but that was taken to mean &#8220;change to reflect modern (and correct) attitudes to homosexuality etc.&#8221; not &#8220;change to reflect socialist ideals as advocated by Labour&#8221;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2007/05/17/grammars-ditched/#comment-17797</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 20:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2007/05/17/grammars-ditched/#comment-17797</guid>
					<description>Howcome Cameron didn't mention this in his leadership campaign?

The guy is just like Tony Blair stands for nothing but obtaining power and a personal legacy and would sell out anything to get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howcome Cameron didn&#8217;t mention this in his leadership campaign?</p>
<p>The guy is just like Tony Blair stands for nothing but obtaining power and a personal legacy and would sell out anything to get it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gav</title>
		<link>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2007/05/17/grammars-ditched/#comment-17763</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 14:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2007/05/17/grammars-ditched/#comment-17763</guid>
					<description>True. I think you've made the points quite clearly on &lt;a href=&quot;http://observationsfromthehillside.blogspot.com/2007/05/conservative-education-plans-raise-fear.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;your post&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True. I think you&#8217;ve made the points quite clearly on <a href="http://observationsfromthehillside.blogspot.com/2007/05/conservative-education-plans-raise-fear.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">your post</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: MJW</title>
		<link>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2007/05/17/grammars-ditched/#comment-17760</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 11:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2007/05/17/grammars-ditched/#comment-17760</guid>
					<description>Labour’s warped ideology that reduction to the lowest common denominator is the best way to achieve “equality” in education has managed to fail everybody; those who are academically inclined and those who’d be better off doing something more vocational. To see the Conservatives continue with this failed approach is worrying, but it’s even more concerning to see good parenting considered unfair!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Labour’s warped ideology that reduction to the lowest common denominator is the best way to achieve “equality” in education has managed to fail everybody; those who are academically inclined and those who’d be better off doing something more vocational. To see the Conservatives continue with this failed approach is worrying, but it’s even more concerning to see good parenting considered unfair!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
