<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Right-wing Anarchist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2007/10/11/right-wing-anarchist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2007/10/11/right-wing-anarchist/</link>
	<description>Liberal, Green and Fair</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 17:18:32 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gav</title>
		<link>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2007/10/11/right-wing-anarchist/#comment-27030</link>
		<dc:creator>Gav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2007/10/11/right-wing-anarchist/#comment-27030</guid>
		<description>Oh, I&#039;m sure you&#039;re right that it&#039;s not 50% or even nearly 50% but if it were that high, what could they do with their vote...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re right that it&#8217;s not 50% or even nearly 50% but if it were that high, what could they do with their vote&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James G.</title>
		<link>http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2007/10/11/right-wing-anarchist/#comment-26816</link>
		<dc:creator>James G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 12:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/2007/10/11/right-wing-anarchist/#comment-26816</guid>
		<description>&quot;Say 50% of people want a government that does not interfere, does not impose behaviour-modifying legislation&quot;

That may be stretching it a bit...

Would that same 50% of people want to dismantle the NHS?  I doubt it.

Unfortunately, when the state is allowed to give to a certain level it is also allowed to take away.  How many people would be willing to pull their snouts from the trough for true freedom?  I would place that number closer to about 10-15% of the population.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Say 50% of people want a government that does not interfere, does not impose behaviour-modifying legislation&#8221;</p>
<p>That may be stretching it a bit&#8230;</p>
<p>Would that same 50% of people want to dismantle the NHS?  I doubt it.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, when the state is allowed to give to a certain level it is also allowed to take away.  How many people would be willing to pull their snouts from the trough for true freedom?  I would place that number closer to about 10-15% of the population.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
