The BBC’s Golden Age

It was not that long ago that the BBC appeared to be heading for trouble. For the first time since the BBC was created the renewal of its right to levy the license fee appeared to be under threat. With the Andrew Gilligan affair in 2003 the BBC appeared to have reached an all-time low. And even with the relatively recent issues surrounding fairness of phone-in competitions, the BBC is having a renaissance.

I recently checked my Virgin Media’s hard drive to see which channels I had recorded television from. There was one programme not from the BBC — and that was a football match on Setanta. The hard disk shines a light on the quality of the BBC’s programming at the moment and shows, actually, that its content is great while that of its competitors is apalling.

To be fair, my opinion is not enough to justify the tone of what I have said. But a completely unscientific straw-poll shows that the only non-BBC viewing of anyone I know has been of football — Sky Sports during the weekend and on Thursday last week for domestic and European football and Setanta Sports.

The BBC has excellent programmes including Eggheads, The Tudors, Only Connect, The Story of Mathematics, Bruce Parry’s Amazon, Harry and Paul, Mock the Week, Live at the Apollo, Heroes. And that’s to ignore the improving output of BBC Radio 4. This with BBC HD (the only HD channel on Virgin at the moment) and, most importantly, BBC iPlayer (which I am now smugly using on my Nokia N96) make the BBC a force to be reckoned with.

In 2003/2004 when the BBC was preparing for the renewal, things needed to change and many people questioned the value for money of the license fee. In fact, I carried a link on this blog to a campaign to remove the privileged position of the BBC. But it’s done good. It is now amazing value for money.

The reviews have worked and the BBC deserves praise. I still hate the bias of the BBC’s news and reporting, but the bias appears to be in favour of the party I support now, rather than in favour of the party I do not, so it’s difficult to summon quite so much concern… how terrible of me to think that!

One final thought for Robert Peston: Tonight’s BBC Four programme, The Greed Game was an excellent piece of work. It explained, clearly, how and why the credit crunch came about. It was, if you’ll excuse the gushing, the sort of programme that the BBC was made to make. Robert Peston’s name has become synonymous with the Credit Crunch as his excellent reporting has clarified the whole issue for the masses; this programme made sense of an extraordinarily complex subject. My only question is why, with his clearly great grasp of finance, he works as a relatively low-paid journalist!



Like this entry? Share it with others:
Facebook |  | Delicious |   |  | 

, , , , ,

  1. #1 by Cassandrina on October 7th, 2008 - 11:07 pm

    “but the bias appears to be in favour of the party I support now, rather than in favour of the party I do not”
    Bottom of page states you are Conservative.
    bbc support NuLabor – stop!
    SHURELY some mistake on your part unless you do not really listen to the Toaday Programme et al on Radio 4.
    As for Peston he stated he broke the story of B&B but strangely I read of it at 4am on the day he “broke it” on the web from the USA.
    Playing both ends as a simple hack?

  2. #2 by Debs on October 8th, 2008 - 12:21 am

    “I Love The 1970s” had the lousiest research I have ever seen. I mean, since when was 1967 1970? And since when was 1982 1979? This apparently year-by-year run down of 70s pop culture was a disgrace – particularly as the BBC has a huge archive from that decade. It shook my faith in Auntie.

  3. #3 by Gav on October 8th, 2008 - 8:37 pm

    Okay, so there are bad programmes, Debs, but I even managed to forget Who Do You Think You Are?

  4. #4 by jameshigham on October 10th, 2008 - 11:15 am

    Think I’ll develop this one, Gavin.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Comments are closed.


SetPageWidth