Posted by Gav on February 27th, 2006
Note these are not my words… Courtesy of the TPA:
First stage in campaign to make the case for the dynamics effects of tax cuts
The TaxPayers’ Alliance and Stockholm Network have published a new pamphlet on the proposals for a British flat tax by Allister Heath - Associate Editor of The Spectator magazine and Deputy Editor of The Business newspaper. You can download the full pamphlet here (pdf 4Mb).
The pamphlet - ‘A Flat Tax: Towards a British Model’ - shows that a flat tax would be a simpler and fairer way of taxing people in Britain and that it would boost the economy. According to Heath, “The results of the simulation for my 28% flat tax plan with merged NICs and income tax, zero double taxation of profits and a £9,000 personal allowance show that the poor would benefit hugely from a flat tax; the rich would at first gain almost nothing on average because of the elimination of their favourite loopholes but the massively lower marginal tax rates they would face would still lead to an explosion of work, risk-taking and entrepreneurship, giving the economy a huge fillip.”
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted by Gav on January 6th, 2006
Journalist of the year: Mark Steyn
For example
Posted by Gav on December 18th, 2005

Nontheism / Atheism
I was going to stay away from discussion of religion for a while but Mark Steyn has provoked my typing fingers again.
In this week’s issue of The Spectator he writes an article entitled ‘O come, all ye faithless’ and makes the single most common error of monotheists. Apparently it is “hard to deny that the fear of an afterlife where one will be judged has likely kept hundreds of millions from committing acts of aggression”.
To that I would say “Maybe in the past”. A modern rationalist would not deliberately destroy the atmosphere for the next generation whether they are childless of not. A moral person is not necessarily a religious person, and certainly not necessarily someone who worships a monotheistic God. Take ten Christians, ten Muslims, ten Jews and ten Hindus and I would guess (oh, politically incorrect stereotype coming, sorry) that the ten Hindus would have more grounded, rational and laudable morals.
Steyn then describes the optimism of the relatively religious US (61% were optimistic about the future a year after 9/11) against the pessimism of the relatively secular Canada (43%), the UK (42%), France (29%), Russia (23%) and Germany (15%). But these figures show other truths. France, Russia and Germany all suffer from economic malhealth which could account for a large proportion, and maybe pessimism is more healthy than an irrational faith in a better future?
Apparently nontheists are less motivated than monoethestic religious people too, but there’s no evidence of that. Rationalism does not necessarily make someone immoral or allow someone to behave in a less considerate manner. I am worried that humanity may need to believe in divine punishment in order to do good - I hope it is not true, and I doubt it is.
Comments