Posts Tagged ‘Argus’

Conservatives’ attempted smear

I was called by the Argus this afternoon unfortunately while I was at work in my day-job so sadly I was not able to speak to their reporter in time for it to be certain that my response will be included in a story that will be published shortly.

I am extremely disappointed that the Conservative leadership have decided to take this path as I had every expectation that we would be able to work together in the future for the betterment of Adur District in a friendly way. In fact, in my letter to the Leader of the Council I made it quite clear that my reasons for leaving were not in any way a reflection on the Conservatives as individuals. The following is an extract:

I have had my differences, since 2006 when I was elected, with a few people in the party locally, but none of these differences are the cause, or even contributed to my change of heart.

I have found it an extraordinary culture shock, actually, since joining the Council as there’s a lot more ‘politics’ than I have experienced in the real world. At my usual place of work the vast majority do not gossip or insult their colleagues behind each others’ backs and if there’s a problem that needs resolving, people tend to have a chat with the appropriate person. Not so in local politics it seems!

The friendly chap who answered the phone at The Argus read me the Conservative press release and in the absence of an opportunity to respond in the paper, I have drafted the following response:

The Conservative press release suggests that I was deselected as a Conservative Councillor and rather than choosing to leave the party I was compelled by the potential of losing my seat to seek alternatives. I would like to make it quite clear that I have had no interaction whatsoever with the Conservative Party locally in relation to seeking to defend my seat as a Conservative. At around the same time as I decided to switch parties, for idealogical reasons, I also spoke to a Conservative colleague who had expressed an interest in representing the Buckingham Ward and told her that she would have my personal support (she’s a very likeable person as well as being a great Councillor and a hard-worker).

I will be the first to admit that I have not put the hours into being a Councillor that some of my retired colleagues have been able to, but I believe I have represented my constituents’ interests well where I could, and I have provided valuable input to meetings that I have attended.

One of the comments in the press release attempts to associate the amount of allowance that I have claimed to the number of meetings I have attended. This is extraordinarily spurious and should never be the way these numbers are used. It is simplistic in the extreme to suggest that the amount of allowance a Councillor ‘deserves’ should be related to how many meetings they have attended. I did miss a few meetings this year but I have responded promptly and in a helpful manner to my constituents’ requests for information, assistance and advice.

The constituents of Buckingham are fortunate to have Councillor Kennard represent them and she does work very hard for them — I hadn’t previously chosen to shout about the number of people I have helped — I think it is more appropriate to respond to the question and move on!

Since the representatives on each committee were decided earlier this year, I have only been a member of the Constitution and Audit Committee aside from Full Council meetings. This has reduced, significantly the opportunities that I have to be present at Council. This allocation of committees is carried out by the very ‘inner circle’ that was criticised in the press release announcing Carl English’s decision to represent the more reasoned, Liberal Democrat party.

Earlier in my term, however, and before the Cabinet system was adopted, I was welcomed onto the Policy & Strategy Committee for the very reason that I was able to apply intelligence and calm consideration to complex issues at Council. I was vice chair on the Housing and Central Services committee I believe for those same reasons.

So I find it shocking that the Conservatives would now suggest that they would not have chosen to retain these, sadly rare, qualities in one of their own. I believe, if the party wants to be judged on the record of its Councillors (again, according to the Press Release), it should look carefully at some of the people that have passed their supposedly stringent criteria. There are a few highly competent Councillors in the Conservative ranks at Adur and I could name them if I didn’t think that that would be rude. This reliance on a few, though, is not good for the health of Adur Council and reflects strongly on their new criteria given some of the people that I understand have been reselected.

I have requested an opportunity to speak at the next Full Council meeting on 8 December and I would encourage members of the public who are interested, to come along. The meeting starts at 7pm at the Civic Centre on Ham Road (Google Map) and if you enter the main entrance, a friendly person will let you know where the public seating area is.

The Liberal Democrat Party

The Liberal Democrat Party logo

, , , , , , ,

No Comments


The BNP need not campaign

The trouble with race relations is not the actions of ethnic minorities, it’s not even the actions of the BNP and other racists, it’s the actions of white do-gooders.

“You know,” said one Brighton & Hove Council Officer to another “what would be a great idea? If we only allowed coloured people to apply for a job in our museum.”

She must have continued “There are far too many white people working in Brighton’s Museum and everyone knows that our interviewers are pro-white racists so, rather than tackling that, let’s just interview only non-white people!”

This is how Kieron Keenan was told he may not apply for a job at Brighton Museum according to the article by Rob Hustwayte in today’s Argus (no permalinks, hence no link).

And on their first day at work the new researcher at Brighton Museum will feel good inside that they got a job, not on merit, but because of the self-righteous bigots who decided that the Race Relations Act should be misused in this way.

The Brighton & Hove Black History Project thinks it is acceptable to try and ensure a “more representative” workforce. What utter, undisguised, racist nonsense!

Ohhhh, I’m going all Daily Mail!

With this one action we have:
- Made Chinese/African/Asian/Afro-Caribbean applicants feel that they need help to get a job
- Illustrated that Brighton & Hove City Council do not believe in merit
- Illustrated that even if they did believe in merit, they don’t trust their interviewers to employ based on it
- Made white moderates angry
- Made ethnic minorities (who are, afterall, a homogenous group) angry
- Given white extremists even more ammunition
- Effected the life of Kieron Keenan
- Damaged race relations
- Brought disrepute on the Race Relations Act (though that was self-inflicted).

David Cameron had better not ever come out in favour of positive discrimination.

I may need to edit this post later, but that’s how I feel now.

, , , , ,

10 Comments


Cllr Willows debacle rolls on

I would normally link to an article but the Argus in Brighton has a strange policy of having no permalinks. Anyway, below is an article from today’s online Argus:

Tories welcome gay flag

by Miriam Wells
Conservative councillors have called for the lesbian gay bisexual and transgender (LGBT) rainbow flag to be flown from council buildings more frequently.
This is despite the condemnation of gay sex as “unnatural” by one of their members.
Earlier this year, Brighton and Hove city councillor, Peter Willows, wrote to The Argus condemning the council for flying the LGBT flag to mark International Day Against Homophobia (Idaho).
Coun Willows, who is now facing potential criminal charges for homophobic remarks made at an official council gathering, wrote: “Why should any country have to fly a flag because of men sleeping together to have sex? And also women sleeping together to have sex? In my world that does not justify flying any flag. It’s an unnatural act.”
But now his party has proposed a motion specifically praising the flying of the flag. It also suggested it be done more frequently.
A motion to be considered by full council tomorrow, calls for local, national and international events be marked by flag flying.
The motion states: “The council’s solidarity with Idaho has set a welcome precedent for other events to be celebrated in the same manner.
“Festivals from other countries and faiths should also be celebrated with the flying of an appropriate flag.
“Events of considerable local importance should also be marked, for example the LGBT rainbow flag could be flown on the first working day of Pride.”
It commends the council’s flying of flags on St George’s Day, the Queen’s birthday and Remembrance Day and suggests events such as World Environment Day, International Women’s Day, and big match days for Albion could be marked by flying flags.
The motion also calls for a flagstaff and bench to be put at a prominent place in the city, such as the Old Steine.
Critics called the Conservative group “hypocritical” for attempting to promote council solidarity with the LGBT community while refusing to withdraw the whip from their openly anti-gay member Coun Willows.
A comment he made at an official council function, that all gay people were paedophiles, is currently being studied by the Crown Prosecution Service.
The Conservative group have suspended him from committees pending the outcome of the criminal investigation, but have not withdrawn the whip from him and have allowed him to continue ward councillor duties.
Labour council leader Simon Burgess said: “They might like to look at what’s been done in the past as we already fly the rainbow flag for Pride.
“The idea that they are leading calls for the flag to be flown is just not true.”
Conservative leader Brian Oxley said: “The flag motion was something the Conservative group discussed before Coun Willows made his comments. It is entirely separate from the issue of Coun Willows.”
David Harvey, co-owner of gay magazine 3Sixty, said: “It is a shallow gesture. The Tories are making the right steps but have to sort out their problems in the group.”

Councillor Willows was democratically elected and, so, for what that’s worth he should remain. But there’s absolutely no way he should retain the Conservative whip — especially now he’s making unacceptable comments while sober.

I know Councillor Willows and he was my local Councillor when I joined the party, so I am disappointed that he retains 1980s views that have no basis in pragmatism, fairness or reason.

Councillor Willows should not be voted for in the next Council elections (if the party continue with him as their candidate)…

, , ,

6 Comments



SetPageWidth