Ken Loach was on the BBC’s Newsnight programme this evening debating the miner’s strike with Nigel Lawson. It was clear, I think, that Ken Loach is a sad man who has completely missed the failure of socialism.

He described a post-war Britain in which people had learnt the value of working together. His idea was that working together meant State ownership and, far from debating the whether the mines needed to be closed, he attacked the individualist world that was created by the destruction of the destructive unions.

I thought that intellectual socialism was dead in the UK. I thought that the young who would have joined the CND and marched in protest at anti-Union laws in the 1970s and 80s, had now moved on to supporting (un)Fair Trade and complaining about Global Warming (while simultaneously defending people who don’t believe in science when it suits them). But it appears there are a still few stalwarts the BBC can dig out to attack the consensus and provide ‘balance’.

Far from causing an age of selfishness, a period of genuine capitalism would have increased charitable giving and would have enabled all in society to benefit from the fruits of economic growth. Those fruits, which come from being competitive, do not just benefit the so-called fat cats, they also provide employment to the masses through direct employment by the successful companies but also through employment providing services to those employees. By working against each other in a competitive spirit (which isn’t nasty and aggressive) everyone benefits. I imagine a deeply depressing world inside Ken Loach’s head and I feel pity in a way which I am sure would cause him to become angry at me for patronising him.

But Newsnight tried to suggest that the ideological age was behind us; tried to imply that consensus politics had arrived and the debate was over a smaller middle-ground. I think that is dangerously naive. Aside from the obvious dangers of extreme left-wing players in the form of the BNP, Respect and Islamic Fascism, we also have the idealogical split between those who believe in freedom and those who do not.

The truth is there are three major parties two of which claim to believe in personal freedom to some extent (Conservatives, Liberal Democrats), and one which does not (Labour) and there are three minor parties that believe in freedom (Libertarians, UK Independence Party, Cannabis Alliance) and countless that do not.

Skip ad

But at any election, if a member of the public believes in the repeal of RIPA (nationally) or in the abolition of Civil Parking Enforcement (locally) or in a withdrawal of Council services that would be better served by charities (nationally or locally) who should someone vote for? Cameron’s new Bill of Rights is more promising than the offers from other parties hence my affiliation, but there’s really no chance of the Road Traffic Act being amended.

Socialism has been mortally wounded but environmentalists, Fair Trade advocates (you know it’s being promoted in schools?) and europhiles still pose a significant danger.

Classical liberals are now fighting on two fronts and it is by no means certain that we will win eventually. It is important that debates continues, that good science (biology, chemistry, geology, palaeontology, physics) is allowed freedom from attack by the religious, and that good people do not hide behind the most frightening phrase of our time: “If you have nothing to hide…”